How can a traveling bullet be accurately measured?
E-Mail Wadlo
Biography
Stats
Favorites
Movies
Recipe
Résumé
CPU
Photos
Desktop
Artwork
Writings
Talents
Wish List
In Universe
Projects
Trails
Birthday Index
mIRC Project
Zip Convert
UT2k4 Project
Rummy Project
Music
Reviews
Hot List
Wish List
'66 Bug
Restoration
Specs
Performance
Photos
IRC Channel
Channel
Nick Archive
ARTI
Scripts
Feedback
Survey
Guestbook
Opinions
Quotes
Bug Finder
ICQ/IRC
Haz-Misc-Mat
Quizzes
Madlibs
Encryption
Brown Dog
Rogue
Cipher
Intergalactics
Relative Moons
Amazing But True
Wadlo's Programs
Y377o
Wadlo's Fish
Gravitational Sim
Web Site Info
The Site FAQ
The Mission
The Scanning
Site History
Members
Update Cal
Recommends
Format Info
Search Site
Featured On...
Awards
Credits
 
 
Written: May 6, 2004
Put Online: Jun 19, 2004
All by Wadlo at http://www.wadlo.com/

How can a traveling bullet be accurately measured?

How can a traveling bullet be accurately measured?

Answer:

In order to measure the velocity of a bullet, and measure the position of it in space at the same time, 2 photogates can not maximize accuracy of both at the same time. An increase in distance between the gates can improve the average velocity, but it will also decrease the accuracy of position. By placing the gates next to each other, the accuracy of knowing the average velocity will decrease due to the ability to measure the position inside the photogates with great accuracy.

In order to improve knowledge of both position of the bullet in space at a give time, and improve knowledge of the velocity (both momentary and average), the solution is to separate the two gates by a large distance, and add more gates at known positions in-between the two original gates. This will allow for the same accuracy of average velocity, or even show the decrease in velocity, as well as allow for accuracy of position due to the reduction of time in-between gates where the velocity and position is not yet known.

The more gates, the better.

Example:


	gate1	gate2	  >

	|___________|	Bullet

	      X
		  

	>

	|___________|	t=ti



		    >

	|___________|	t=tf


	V = X/t (hence average velocity)

	But:

				>

	|___________|___________|___________|___________|

	v1(avg)=x1/t1           v3(avg)=x3/t3

	            v2(avg)=x2/t2           v4(avg)=x4/t4

	...AND...

	V = X/t

	These average velocities combined will better show de-acceleration.

 

E-Mail Wadlo Biography Projects Music '66 Bug IRC Channel Feedback Haz-Misc-Mat Web Site Info

This website was created and is maintained by Wadlo. Questions and comments about anything on this website can be sent to Wadlo by E-Mailing him.